Governance

Anchor document

ipfs://QmY9CpUCcXe1Me61JDoiYh4j73Lppv3jvqg9w8XnrB1tg9
Hash matches the chain Open original

This document doesn't follow CIP-108 or CIP-119, so there is nothing to lay out. The raw JSON is below.

Document

Hash (BLAKE2b-256)
110948fcdd359705eec83853b6ab72a70d19043f5a87af0752158c3e0f5c8592
Hash on chain
110948fcdd359705eec83853b6ab72a70d19043f5a87af0752158c3e0f5c8592
Fetched from
https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmY9CpUCcXe1Me61JDoiYh4j73Lppv3jvqg9w8XnrB1tg9
Raw JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "comment": "CIP100:comment"
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set"
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "comment": "I recognize the potential value of secure, reusable contract libraries, but this proposal does not demonstrate sufficient additional benefit to justify another 11,787,063 ADA withdrawal. The requested package combines foundational components, developer generators, and three financial reference applications while leaving important matters unresolved: final component scope, customization capabilities, hosting and operational dependencies, developer-support commitments, post-project maintenance, and costs by deliverable. Documentation and usable examples are baseline requirements, not exceptional benefits, and generating a contract or interface does not remove the substantial business-specific development, integration, operations, and security work required for adoption. The proposal also needs a clearer account of how it complements existing and already funded ecosystem tooling. My acceptable spending ceiling for this budget period has already been exceeded, and I am not prepared to support further discretionary expenditure unless it addresses an emergency or a demonstrably exceptional, time-sensitive opportunity. This proposal establishes neither. I therefore vote No."
  },
  "authors": []
}